After much thought and careful consideration, I have concluded that I cannot support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. While I deeply sympathise with those facing terminal illness and their families, I do not believe this Bill offers a safe or workable solution to such a profoundly sensitive issue.
The Bill lacks robust safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals from both subtle and overt coercion, and it risks creating a perception of a “duty to die” for those who feel they are a burden. International examples show that even the most restrictive laws tend to expand over time, with eligibility criteria widening and unintended consequences becoming apparent.
Furthermore, this legislation places undue reliance on an overstretched judicial system, which raises concerns about delays, errors, and inequities in decision-making. In addition, the current state of palliative care in this country is insufficient, and we must address these shortcomings before considering any alternative measures.
Given the gravity of a Bill that deals with life and death, it demands the utmost caution. As it stands, this proposal presents significant risks with far-reaching consequences, particularly for the most vulnerable. For these reasons, I cannot, in good conscience, support it.
I want to express my sincere thanks to all of my constituents who have reached out to share their views on this matter. Your engagement has been invaluable in shaping my thinking, and I am truly grateful for your time, insights, and the open dialogue we have had.
Please see my letter below, which explains my reasoning in full.
